Higher gas fees have sped up token burns on Aptos, but staking emissions are still adding far more APT than the network destroys
Aptos has been burning its native token faster than usual. Over the past 30 days, the Layer-1 blockchain destroyed 174,100 APT, according to a post on X, and has now burned 1.9 million APT since its mainnet went live.
That sounds like a deflation story. The supply math tells a different one.
Data from the network’s real-time supply dashboard puts the monthly figure at 174,195 APT as of mid-October 2026. Meanwhile, staking rewards are minting new tokens at a far quicker clip than fees are removing them.
On Aptos, every transaction fee is burned. None of it goes to validators as revenue, and none of it sits in a treasury.
Think of it as a toll booth that shreds every coin it collects. More traffic means more shredding.
That design got a boost in 2026. A governance proposal raised gas fees on the network tenfold, which naturally increased the amount of APT burned with each transaction.
Even after the hike, transactions stay cheap. The average gas fee sits at around $0.0005, which keeps sending stablecoins on Aptos close to free for ordinary users.
The recent 30-day burn translates to an annualized pace of roughly 2.1 million APT. For a network whose cumulative burn since launch stands at 1.9 million, that is a meaningful acceleration.
Put plainly, Aptos is now on track to burn more in a single year than it did across its entire history up to this point.
Burns are only half the ledger. The other half is staking emissions, the new APT paid out to validators and delegators who secure the network.
Those emissions run at approximately 1.5 million APT per month. Against roughly 174,000 APT burned over the same window, the result is net supply growth of about 1.4 million APT every month.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
So the bathtub is draining a little faster than before. The faucet, however, is still wide open.
This is a common tension for proof-of-stake networks. Paying stakers keeps the chain secure, but those payments dilute holders who are not staking, and a fee burn only offsets that dilution if activity is high enough.
At current levels, Aptos burns cover only a small slice of what staking adds. The higher fees narrowed the gap without coming close to closing it.
Aptos launched its mainnet on October 12, 2022, with an initial supply of 1 billion APT. Supply has expanded since then through staking rewards and token unlocks.
Under a governance measure known as AIP-140, maximum supply is now temporarily capped at 2.1 billion APT. The word “temporarily” is doing real work there, since the cap reflects the current framework rather than a permanent hard limit.
The Aptos Foundation has also taken steps on the supply side. It permanently locked and staked 210 million APT, which represented about 18% of the circulating supply at the time.
Locking tokens takes them out of easy circulation. Staking them, however, means they also earn rewards, which feeds back into the emissions figure described above.
For investors, the headline burn number is less important than the net figure. With roughly 1.4 million APT entering circulation each month, the supply trend remains inflationary even as burns rise.
That ongoing dilution could weigh on the token’s market value. It matters most for holders who are not staking, since stakers at least receive a share of the new issuance.
The path to a better balance runs through on-chain activity. Because every fee is burned, any sustained jump in transaction volume directly increases the amount of APT removed from supply.
One app worth watching is Decibel, which is expected to support higher-frequency trading on Aptos. If trading-heavy applications like that gain traction, burn rates could climb further and start eating more meaningfully into net emissions.
There is a built-in trade-off, though. The low-fee pitch, with transfers costing a fraction of a cent, is a selling point for stablecoin users and traders, and it also limits how much each transaction can burn.
In other words, Aptos needs volume, not pricier transactions, to move the needle. The tenfold fee increase already showed that governance can turn the dial, but pushing fees much higher risks undercutting the network’s cheap-transfer appeal.
The metrics to track are straightforward: monthly burn totals, transaction counts, and any governance changes to staking rewards or the AIP-140 supply cap. A drop in emissions or a surge in usage would shift the balance faster than any single headline burn figure.
For now, 1.9 million APT burned since 2022 is a real milestone. It is also a reminder that a token burn is a counterweight, and on Aptos the other side of the scale is still considerably heavier.